• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: P964 Assessment of long-term durability of transcatheter implanted aortic valves - structural and nonstructural deteriorations in 5 years follow-up
  • Beteiligte: Linkova, H; Petr, R; Paskova, E; Kocka, V; Tousek, P
  • Erschienen: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2020
  • Erschienen in: European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez319.597
  • ISSN: 2047-2404; 2047-2412
  • Schlagwörter: Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine ; Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ; General Medicine
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Introduction</jats:title> <jats:p>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is the method of choice for patient with a significant stenosis (AS) who are contraindicated for cardio-surgical procedure. Medium – term results of TAVI are comparable with results observed for surgical replacements. There is limited knowledge of structural, nonstructural and clinical complications in five years follow-up which could contribute to TAVI indication for implantation in young patients.</jats:p> <jats:p>Goal. The aim of this study is to assess structural and non-structural deterioration of TAVI prosthesis by echocardiography and clinical evaluation at 5 years follow-up.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>By the end of 2013, 112 patients were implanted TAVI in our center( average age, 80,4 ± 7,2 y, 53(47% ) males. All patients underwent both clinical and echocardiographic examination once a year and underwent native CT after five year. We analysed mortality, structural and non- structural deteriorations, and standard echocardiographic parameters before and after implantation, and at 5 years follow-up.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>5-years mortality was 58%. There was not a statistically significant difference in age between the patients who survive and who died (80,2 ±7,3 vs 80,6 ± 7,3 p = 0.77) ,they had similar logistic EUROSCORE (17,0 ± 12,4 vs 16,9 ± 15,0, p = 0,96) and EF 53,8 ± 11,1 vs 52,3 ± 11,7,p= 0,51) before the procedure. 48 patients underwent the five years follow –up. Only one patient had to undergo reTAVI due to the earlier prosthetic degeneration. The average EOA was 1,88 ± 0,33 cm2), the average V max. after five years was 1,8 ± 0,4 m/s, PG max 13,6 ± 6,2 mm Hg a PG mean 8 ± 3,6 mm Hg ( no significant increase in time),Post procedural paravalvular regurgitation ≥ 2/4 appeared in 14 % patients. Twenty –three patients underwent CT scan which resulted in Agaston score O on TAVI replacement in 19(83 %) patients.</jats:p> </jats:sec> <jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>After 5 years follow-up, low rates of structural and nonstructural deterioration after TAVI were noted, suggesting good long- term durability.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang