• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Individual and Regional Determinants for Physical Therapy Utilization in Germany: Multilevel Analysis of National Survey Data
  • Beteiligte: Rommel, Alexander; Kroll, Lars Eric
  • Erschienen: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2017
  • Erschienen in: Physical Therapy
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzx022
  • ISSN: 0031-9023; 1538-6724
  • Schlagwörter: Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>Background. Physical therapy is included in many clinical guidelines and is a commonly used health service. However, access to its benefits should not strongly depend on social or demographic factors.</jats:p> <jats:p>Objective. The present study used the Andersen model to explain to what extent physical therapy utilization in Germany depends on factors beyond medical need.</jats:p> <jats:p>Methods. The German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS, 2008–2011; target population, 18–79 years) is part of the German health-monitoring system. Two-stage stratified cluster sampling resulted in a sample of 8152 participants. Data were matched with district-related information on social structures and service supply. Following Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use, this study identified predisposing, enabling, and need factors for physical therapy utilization using multilevel logistic regression analyses.</jats:p> <jats:p>Results. Physical therapy was used by 23.4% (95% CI: 22.0–24.8) of the German population within one year, with a higher proportion of females (26.8%; 95% CI: 25.1–28.6) than males (19.9%; 95% CI: 18.1–21.8) and an increase with age. Beyond medical need, physical therapy utilization depended on higher education, migrant background, nonsmoking (predisposing), social support, higher income, private health insurance, and gatekeeping service contact (enabling). Variation among districts partly reflected regional supply.</jats:p> <jats:p>Limitations. Because the present study was cross-sectional, its findings provide representative information on physical therapy use but do not establish final causal links or identify whether utilization or supply in certain districts or population groups is adequate.</jats:p> <jats:p>Conclusions. Whether certain regions are under- or overserved and whether further regulations are needed is of political interest. Physicians and therapists should develop strategies to improve both adherence of hard-to-reach groups and supply in low-supply regions.</jats:p>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang