Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>Assessments based on reaction time and language-based interviews postulate that unconscious attachment processes be measured. Nevertheless, a possible empirical equivalence of these two approaches has not yet been investigated. To fill this void, the Adult Attachment Interview and the Implicit Association Test were implemented with a group of patients with panic disorder (<jats:italic toggle="yes">n</jats:italic> = 157, mean age = 29, SD = 2.47) based on the Structured Clinical Interview for <jats:italic toggle="yes">DSM-IV,</jats:italic> axis I and II disorders and a group of healthy individuals (<jats:italic toggle="yes">n</jats:italic> = 138). In total, the securely attached individuals showed significantly more positive attitudes toward their mother than the insecurely attached individuals. In the healthy individuals, the secure and disorganized classifications showed significantly more positive attitudes toward the mother in comparison with the insecure attachment classification, as well as the patient group. In summary, implicit attachment patterns based on reaction times are not equivalent to an attachment representation based on language markers. For the disorganized attachment representation, no differences were present between the information processing of the memory/association network and the autobiographic memory function.</jats:p>