Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>The influence of naturally occurring in‐channel large wood (LW) on the hydraulics, hydrology and geomorphology of rivers is well documented. To inform management and better understand naturally occurring or artificially placed LW, hydraulic and hydrological models are applied to predict the possible benefits and drawbacks for habitat, sediment management and flood risk mitigation. However, knowledge and guidance on appropriate representation in models, needed to underpin realistic predictions, is lacking. This could lead to unrealistic expectations of the effectiveness of LW for different river management goals. To date, seven types of LW representation in hydraulic and hydrological models have been applied, the range partly reflecting the variety of LW, model types, scales and purposes. The most common approach is by altering channel roughness to represent flow resistance. Although qualitatively the effects of LW have been captured using models, to date quantitative validation, as well as transferable knowledge to help a priori parameterization of LW representations, remain limited. Therefore, additional empirical investigations and robust model validation are required to inform defensible LW representations for specific purposes and scales in numerical models coupled with better accounting of input uncertainty to improve confidence in predictions. Future studies should also consider a greater range of artificial and natural LW features, settings, larger spatial scales and better account for temporal variability of flow, morphology and LW configuration.</jats:p><jats:p>This article is categorized under:<jats:list list-type="simple">
<jats:list-item><jats:p>Water and Life > Methods</jats:p></jats:list-item>
<jats:list-item><jats:p>Science of Water > Methods</jats:p></jats:list-item>
<jats:list-item><jats:p>Water and Life > Nature of Freshwater Ecosystems</jats:p></jats:list-item>
</jats:list>
</jats:p>