Kappenberg, Yuri G.;
Stefanello, Felipe S.;
Zanatta, Nilo;
Martins, Marcos A. P.;
Nogara, Pablo A.;
Rocha, João B. T.;
Tisoco, Isadora;
Iglesias, Bernardo A.;
Bonacorso, Helio G.
Beteiligte:
Kappenberg, Yuri G.;
Stefanello, Felipe S.;
Zanatta, Nilo;
Martins, Marcos A. P.;
Nogara, Pablo A.;
Rocha, João B. T.;
Tisoco, Isadora;
Iglesias, Bernardo A.;
Bonacorso, Helio G.
Erschienen:
Wiley, 2022
Erschienen in:
ChemBioChem, 23 (2022) 4
Sprache:
Englisch
DOI:
10.1002/cbic.202100649
ISSN:
1439-4227;
1439-7633
Entstehung:
Anmerkungen:
Beschreibung:
AbstractThe synthesis, structural analysis, and evaluation of the photophysical properties of twelve novel 2‐aryl(heteroaryl)‐6‐(4‐alkyl(aryl)‐1H‐1,2,3‐triazol‐1‐yl)‐4‐(trifluoromethyl)quinolines (6‐8), where aryl(heteroaryl)=Ph, 4‐Me‐C6H4, 4‐F‐C6H4 and 2‐ furyl; 4‐alkyl(aryl)=−CH2OH, −(CH2)5CH3 and Ph, are reported. Hybrid scaffolds 6–8 were synthesized at 77–95 % yields by regioselective copper‐catalysed azide‐alkyne cycloaddition (CuAAC) reaction of unpublished 6‐azido‐4‐(trifluoromethyl)quinolines (2) with selected terminal alkynes (3–5). Azido intermediates 2 were obtained from the reaction of 6‐amino‐4‐(trifluoromethyl)quinolines (1) and sodium azide at good yields (78–87 %). Compounds 6–8 were structurally fully characterized by 1H−, 13C− and 19F− and 1H−13C 2D‐NMR (HSQC, HMBC) spectroscopy, X‐ray diffraction (SC‐XRD) and HRMS analysis. Moreover, the photophysical properties, DNA‐ and HSA‐binding experiments (bio‐interactions), and molecular docking studies for compounds 6–8 were performed. These are discussed and compared with similar compounds from recent research.