> Detailanzeige

Smith, Jacqueline A.; Finkel, Robert C.; Farber, Daniel L.; Rodbell, Donald T.; Seltzer, Geoffrey O.

Moraine preservation and boulder erosion in the tropical Andes: interpreting old surface exposure ages in glaciated valleys

Literatur-
verwaltung

Zur
Merkliste

Lösche von
Merkliste

Per Whatsapp teilen

Schließen

Merkliste



Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
  • Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Moraine preservation and boulder erosion in the tropical Andes: interpreting old surface exposure ages in glaciated valleys
  • Beteiligte: Smith, Jacqueline A.; Finkel, Robert C.; Farber, Daniel L.; Rodbell, Donald T.; Seltzer, Geoffrey O.
  • Erschienen: Wiley, 2005
  • Erschienen in: Journal of Quaternary Science, 20 (2005) 7-8, Seite 735-758
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1002/jqs.981
  • ISSN: 1099-1417; 0267-8179
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Cosmogenic dating provides a long‐awaited means of directly dating glacial deposits that pre‐date the last glacial cycle. Although the potential benefits of longer chronologies are obvious, the greater uncertainty associated with older cosmogenic ages may be less readily apparent. We illustrate the challenges of developing and interpreting a long chronology using our data from the Peruvian Andes. We used surface exposure dating with cosmogenic radionuclides (CRNs; <jats:sup>10</jats:sup>Be and <jats:sup>26</jats:sup>Al) to date 140 boulders on moraines in valleys bordering the Junin Plain (11° S, 76° W) in central Peru. Our chronology spans multiple glacial cycles and includes exposure ages greater than 1 million years, which indicate that long‐term rates of boulder erosion have been very low. Interpreting the chronology of moraines for glaciations that predate the last glacial cycle is complicated by the need to consider boulder erosion and exhumation, surface uplift, and inheritance of CRNs from previous exposure intervals. As an example, we recalculate exposure ages using our boulder erosion rates (0.3–0.5 metres per million years) and estimated surface uplift rates to emphasise both the challenges involved in interpreting old surface exposure ages and the value of chronological data, even with large uncertainties, when reconstructing the palaeoclimate of a region. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</jats:p>