Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>We model the performance of parallel transmission (pTx) arrays with 8, 16, 24, and 32 channels and varying loop sizes built on a close‐fitting helmet for brain imaging at 7 T and compare their local specific absorption rate (SAR) and flip‐angle performances to that of birdcage coil (used as a baseline) and cylindrical 8‐channel and 16‐channel pTx coils (single‐row and dual‐row).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>We use the co‐simulation approach along with <jats:italic>MATLAB</jats:italic> scripting for batch‐mode simulation of the coils. For each coil, we extracted B<jats:sub>1</jats:sub><jats:sup>+</jats:sup> maps and SAR matrices, which we compressed using the virtual observation points algorithm, and designed slice‐selective RF shimming pTx pulses with multiple local SAR and peak power constraints to generate L‐curves in the transverse, coronal, and sagittal orientations.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Helmet designs outperformed cylindrical pTx arrays at a constant number of channels in the flip‐angle uniformity at a constant local SAR metric: up to 29% for 8‐channel arrays, and up to 34% for 16‐channel arrays, depending on the slice orientation. For all helmet arrays, increasing the loop diameter led to better local SAR versus flip‐angle uniformity tradeoffs, although this effect was more pronounced for the 8‐channel and 16‐channel systems than the 24‐channel and 32‐channel systems, as the former have more limited degrees of freedom and therefore benefit more from loop‐size optimization.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Helmet pTx arrays significantly outperformed cylindrical arrays with the same number of channels in local SAR and flip‐angle uniformity metrics. This improvement was especially pronounced for non‐transverse slice excitations. Loop diameter optimization for helmets appears to favor large loops, compatible with nearest‐neighbor decoupling by overlap.</jats:p></jats:sec>