Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Background</jats:title>
<jats:p>High flow bypass surgery can be a last resort procedure for patients suffering from complex neurovascular pathology. Temporary occlusion of a recipient artery in these patients could result in debilitating neurological deficits. We developed a sutureless, mechanical anastomotic connection device, the SELANA clip (Sutureless Excimer Laser-Assisted Non-occlusive Anastomosis clip: SEcl). In the present study, we aim to determine the long-term non-inferiority of the SEcl technique compared with historical data of the conventional ELANA anastomosis technique.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Methods</jats:title>
<jats:p>A total of 18 SEcl bypasses were created on the carotid artery in a porcine model in 6 different survival groups. Mean application times, flap retrieval rates, hemostasis, patency, flow, endothelialization, and remodeling were assessed.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Results</jats:title>
<jats:p>The mean application time of the SEcl anastomoses was 15.2 ± 9.6 min, which was faster compared with the conventional ELANA anastomoses. The flap retrieval rate of the SEcl anastomoses was 86% (32/37). Direct hemostasis was achieved in 89% (33/37) SEcl anastomoses. Patency in all surviving animals was 94% (17/18). Bypass flow after six months was 156.5 ± 24.7 mL/min. Full endothelialization of the SEcl pins was observed after 3 weeks.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title>
<jats:p>The SEcl technique is not inferior to the ELANA technique regarding patency, flap retrieval rate, flow, and endothelialization. On the basis of a significantly shorter application time and superior hemostasis, the SEcl technique could be preferable over the ELANA technique. A pilot study in patients is a logical next step based on our current results.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>