Grosch, Katharina;
Meister, Jörg;
Raval, Sanjay D.;
Fouda, Ahmed Mahmoud;
Bourauel, Christoph
Comparative evaluation of different debonding and reconditioning methods for orthodontic ceramic brackets regarding effectiveness for reuse Vergleichende Auswertung verschiedener Debonding- und Aufbereitungsmethoden für kieferorthopädische Keramikbrackets hinsichtlich der Wiederverwendbarkeit : An in vitro study Eine In-vitro-Studie
Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
Medientyp:
E-Artikel
Titel:
Comparative evaluation of different debonding and reconditioning methods for orthodontic ceramic brackets regarding effectiveness for reuse Vergleichende Auswertung verschiedener Debonding- und Aufbereitungsmethoden für kieferorthopädische Keramikbrackets hinsichtlich der Wiederverwendbarkeit : An in vitro study Eine In-vitro-Studie
:
An in vitro study
Beteiligte:
Grosch, Katharina;
Meister, Jörg;
Raval, Sanjay D.;
Fouda, Ahmed Mahmoud;
Bourauel, Christoph
Erschienen:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2023
Erschienen in:Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie
Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Purpose</jats:title>
<jats:p>To investigate the reusability of ceramic brackets in terms of shear bond strength, friction behavior, slot dimension, fracture strength, and color stability.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Methods</jats:title>
<jats:p>A total of 90 conventionally debonded and 30 by an Er:YAG laser debonded ceramic brackets were collected. All the used brackets were inspected under a stereomicroscope at 18 × magnification and sorted according to their adhesive remnant index (ARI). Five groups were formed (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 10): (1) new brackets as a control group, (2) flamed and sandblasted, (3) flamed and acid bathed, (4) laser-reconditioned, and (5) laser-debonded brackets. The bracket groups were tested regarding different properties such as shear bond strength, friction behavior, slot size, fracture strength, and color stability. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis (significance level: <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> < 0.05).</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Results</jats:title>
<jats:p>Shear bond strength values of the acid reconditioned brackets were significantly lower (8.0 ± 3.1 MPa) compared to the control group (12.9 ± 2.9 MPa). Laser-reconditioned (32.8 ± 2.7%) and laser-debonded (30.9 ± 2.4%) brackets showed the lowest force loss due to friction (control group 38.3 ± 3.0%). No significant differences were observed between groups regarding slot size and fracture strength. All groups had color differences of <jats:inline-formula><jats:alternatives><jats:tex-math>$${\Updelta E}_{ab}^{\mathrm{*}}$$</jats:tex-math><mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML">
<mml:msubsup>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mo>∆</mml:mo>
<mml:mi>E</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>a</mml:mi>
<mml:mi>b</mml:mi>
</mml:mrow>
<mml:mi>*</mml:mi>
</mml:msubsup>
</mml:math></jats:alternatives></jats:inline-formula>< 10. Scanning electron microscope images and ARI scores indicated that most of the residues on the bracket bases were removed.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title>
<jats:p>All reconditioning methods yielded adequate results regarding bracket properties. Yet, focusing on the need to protect the enamel and the bracket base, laser debonding seems to be the most suitable method for reconditioning ceramic brackets.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>