Comparative durability tests of preservative-treated and chemically modified wood – Assessment and classification on the basis of different decay tests
Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
Medientyp:
E-Artikel
Titel:
Comparative durability tests of preservative-treated and chemically modified wood – Assessment and classification on the basis of different decay tests
Erschienen:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2024
Erschienen in:European Journal of Wood and Wood Products
Sprache:
Englisch
DOI:
10.1007/s00107-024-02065-3
ISSN:
0018-3768;
1436-736X
Entstehung:
Anmerkungen:
Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Not before the year 2016, the European standard system did allow for classifying the durability of treated wood in addition to natural durability of untreated wood species. After its latest revision, EN 350 (2016) allows a durability classification of solid wood and wood-based materials with the help of five durability classes (DC) between ‘very durable’ (DC 1) and ‘non-durable’ (DC 5). However, different test methods, assessment measures, and calculation methods can be used for durability classification. This inevitably leads to different assessments of the biological durability of wood. This study aimed therefore on a comparative durability classification of preservative-treated and chemically modified wood (here: treated with 1,3-dimethylol-4,5-dihydroxyethyleneurea, DMDHEU) using different laboratory and field test methods. Durability classes of the tested timbers differed not only between tested materials, but depended also on the applied test, assessment, and calculation method. In this respect, the use of relative values (x-values), i.e., mass loss (ML) or MOE loss data compared with a non-durable reference material can help to harmonize the classification and make DCs more comparable. The use of relative values can also help to reduce the effect of varying virulence of test fungi, activity of test soil substrates, and the climate-induced hazard of test sites.</jats:p>