> Detailanzeige

Behera, Shri Hari Priya; Misra, Satyajeet; Behera, Bikram Kishore

Influence of 3% Hypertonic Saline Versus 0.9% Saline on Intraoperative Maintenance Fluid Requirements in Adult Patients Undergoing Major Open Abdominal Surgeries: Randomized Controlled Study

Literatur-
verwaltung

Zur
Merkliste

Lösche von
Merkliste

Per Whatsapp teilen

Schließen

Merkliste



Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
  • Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Influence of 3% Hypertonic Saline Versus 0.9% Saline on Intraoperative Maintenance Fluid Requirements in Adult Patients Undergoing Major Open Abdominal Surgeries: Randomized Controlled Study
  • Beteiligte: Behera, Shri Hari Priya; Misra, Satyajeet; Behera, Bikram Kishore
  • Erschienen: Wiley, 2022
  • Erschienen in: World Journal of Surgery, 46 (2022) 6, Seite 1344-1350
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1007/s00268-022-06484-2
  • ISSN: 0364-2313; 1432-2323
  • Schlagwörter: Surgery
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Three percent hypertonic saline (3% HTS) acts like an osmotic buffer and draws fluid from the extracellular space into the intravascular compartment. Primary objective was to evaluate whether use of 3% HTS resulted in a difference in intraoperative maintenance fluid requirement versus 0.9% saline (NS). Secondary objectives were to evaluate differences in 24 h fluid requirements and safety of 3% HTS.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Adult patients of either sex, 18–65 years, undergoing elective major open abdominal surgeries were randomized to receive infusions of 3% HTS or NS at 1 ml/kg/hr through large bore peripheral i.v cannulas, or central venous catheters after anesthesia induction. Intraoperative maintenance fluids were administered to maintain mean arterial pressure (≥70 mmHg), urine output (≥0.5 ml/kg/hr) and central venous pressure of 8–10 cm H<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>O.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Ninety‐three patients completed the study (46 in 3% HTS and 47 in NS group). No difference was seen in the volume of intraoperative maintenance fluids (3% HTS vs NS; 2243.9 ± 896.7 ml vs 2093.6 ± 868.7 ml; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.34). Similarly, the 24 h postoperative fluid requirement was not different (3% HTS vs NS; 2006.6 ± 398.6 ml vs 2018.3 ± 389.3 ml; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.94). Patients in 3% HTS group had statistically but not clinically significant higher serum sodium values at postoperative 12th and 24 h. No complication like thrombophlebitis or tissue ischemia was reported due to administration of 3% HTS through peripheral lines.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Administration of 3% HTS did not reduce intraoperative maintenance fluid requirements in patients undergoing major open abdominal surgeries.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Trial registration</jats:title><jats:p>CTRI/2019/09/021032.</jats:p></jats:sec>