> Detailanzeige

Giordano, Andrea; De Panfilis, Ludovica; Veronese, Simone; Bruzzone, Michela; Cascioli, Marta; Farinotti, Mariangela; Giovannetti, Ambra Mara; Grasso, Maria Grazia; Kruger, Paola; Lugaresi, Alessandra; Manson, Leigh; Perin, Marta; Pucci, Eugenio; Solaro, Claudio; Ghirotto, Luca; Solari, Alessandra

User appraisal of a booklet for advance care planning in multiple sclerosis: a multicenter, qualitative Italian study

Literatur-
verwaltung

Zur
Merkliste

Lösche von
Merkliste

Per Whatsapp teilen

Schließen

Merkliste



Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
  • Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: User appraisal of a booklet for advance care planning in multiple sclerosis: a multicenter, qualitative Italian study
  • Beteiligte: Giordano, Andrea; De Panfilis, Ludovica; Veronese, Simone; Bruzzone, Michela; Cascioli, Marta; Farinotti, Mariangela; Giovannetti, Ambra Mara; Grasso, Maria Grazia; Kruger, Paola; Lugaresi, Alessandra; Manson, Leigh; Perin, Marta; Pucci, Eugenio; Solaro, Claudio; Ghirotto, Luca; Solari, Alessandra
  • Erschienen: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2024
  • Erschienen in: Neurological Sciences
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1007/s10072-023-07087-y
  • ISSN: 1590-1874; 1590-3478
  • Schlagwörter: Psychiatry and Mental health ; Neurology (clinical) ; Dermatology ; General Medicine
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Objectives</jats:title> <jats:p>Implementation of advance care planning (ACP) in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (PwPMS) is limited. We aimed to involve users (PwPMS, significant others, and healthcare professionals involved in PwPMS care) in the evaluation and refinement of a booklet to be used during the ACP conversations.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>This qualitative study consisted of cognitive interviews with PwPMS and significant others and a focus group with healthcare professionals from three Italian centers. We analyzed the interviews using the framework method and the focus group using thematic analysis.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>We interviewed 10 PwPMS (3 women; median age 54 years; median Expanded Disability Status Scale score 6.0) and three significant others (2 women; 2 spouses and one daughter). The analysis yielded three themes: booklet comprehensibility and clarity, content acceptability and emotional impact, and suggestions for improvement. Twelve healthcare professionals (7 neurologists, 3 psychologists, one nurse, and one physiotherapist) participated in the focus group, whose analysis identified two themes: booklet’s content importance and clarity and challenges to ACP implementation. Based on analysis results, we revised the booklet (text, layout, and pictures) and held a second-round interviews with two PwPMS and one significant other. The interviewees agreed on the revisions but reaffirmed their difficulty in dealing with the topic and the need for a physician when using the booklet.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Appraisal of the booklet was instrumental in improving its acceptability and understandability before using it in the ConCure-SM feasibility trial. Furthermore, our data reveal a lack of familiarity with ACP practice in the Italian context.</jats:p> </jats:sec>