• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Interpretation preferences in contexts with three antecedents: examining the role of prominence in German pronouns
  • Beteiligte: Patterson, Clare; Schumacher, Petra B.
  • Erschienen: Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2021
  • Erschienen in: Applied Psycholinguistics, 42 (2021) 6, Seite 1427-1461
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1017/s0142716421000291
  • ISSN: 0142-7164; 1469-1817
  • Schlagwörter: General Psychology ; Linguistics and Language ; Language and Linguistics ; Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>This paper focuses on the relational notion of prominence, in which entities of equal type are ranked according to certain prominence-lending features. In German two demonstrative forms, “der” and “dieser”, can function like personal pronouns in English. It has been proposed that processing “der” involves computing a prominence hierarchy of the prior referents, and excluding the referent with the highest prominence rank. The demonstrative “dieser” has not been extensively tested. In the current study, personal and demonstrative pronominal forms were investigated following ditransitive contexts, where three potential antecedents are available, in two rating experiments. The personal pronoun showed flexibility in that it received equally high ratings for all three antecedents in canonical configurations. The ratings for<jats:italic>dieser</jats:italic>followed a graded sensitivity to thematic role prominence, with lowest scores when referring to prominent antecedents (agents) and the highest scores for the least prominent antecedents (patients), with scores for the medium prominence candidate (recipients) differing from both.<jats:italic>Der</jats:italic>followed a similar but not identical pattern, with a less marked difference between lower prominence candidates. Positional information also has a strong influence on demonstratives. In sum, final interpretation is sensitive to fine-grained differences in prominence hierarchies.</jats:p>