• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Simple Models for Airport Delays During Transition to a Trajectory-Based Air Traffic System
  • Beteiligte: Brooker, Peter
  • Erschienen: Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2009
  • Erschienen in: Journal of Navigation
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1017/s0373463309990105
  • ISSN: 0373-4633; 1469-7785
  • Schlagwörter: Ocean Engineering ; Oceanography
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:p>It is now widely recognised that a paradigm shift in air traffic control concepts is needed. This requires state-of-the-art innovative technologies, making much better use of the information in the air traffic management (ATM) system. These paradigm shifts go under the names of NextGen in the USA and SESAR in Europe, which <jats:italic>inter alia</jats:italic> will make dramatic changes to the nature of airport operations. A vital part of moving from an existing system to a new paradigm is the operational implications of the transition process. There would be business incentives for early aircraft fitment, it is generally safer to introduce new technologies gradually, and researchers are already proposing potential transition steps to the new system. Simple queuing theory models are used to establish rough quantitative estimates of the impact of the transition to a more efficient time-based – four-dimensional (4D) – navigational and ATM system. Such models are approximate, but they do offer insight into the broad implications of system change and its significant features. 4D-equipped aircraft in essence have a contract with the airport runway – they would be required to turn up at a very precise time – and, in return, they would get priority over any other aircraft waiting for use of the runway. The main operational feature examined here is the queuing delays affecting non-4D-equipped arrivals. These get a reasonable service if the proportion of 4D-equipped aircraft is low, but this can deteriorate markedly for high proportions, and be economically unviable. Preventative measures would be to limit the additional growth of 4D-equipped flights and/or to modify their contracts to provide sufficient space for the non-4D-equipped flights to operate without excessive delays. There is a potential for non-Poisson models, for which there is little in the literature, and for more complex models, e.g. grouping a succession of 4D-equipped aircraft as a batch.</jats:p>