Beschreibung:
<jats:p>Since Dilthey's template study of 1890, the Prussian state's attempt to censor Kant's religious writings has typically been seen as the work of a reactionary politics bent on imposing religious orthodoxy as a bulwark against the spread of <jats:italic>Aufklärung</jats:italic>. This essay offers a revisionist interpretation, arguing that the attempted censoring was a by-product of a set of a long-standing <jats:italic>Religionspolitik</jats:italic> designed to achieve religious toleration through a system of regulated public confessions. Reaffirmed in the Religious Edict (1788) and the Censorship Edict (1788), Prussian policy required acceptance of a plurality of public confessions whose stability was preserved through the restriction of public proselytizing and the acceptance of private religious freedom. In breaking with this religious settlement, through their public advocacy of a true “religion of reason”, the Protestant religious rationalists of the theological <jats:italic>Aufklärung</jats:italic> breached the embargo on public proselytizing, leading eventually to government's attempt to censor Kant's own “pure moral religion”.</jats:p>