• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Is There a Defect in the European Court's Defect Test? Musings about Acceptable Risk
  • Beteiligte: Bergkamp, Lucas
  • Erschienen: Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2015
  • Erschienen in: European Journal of Risk Regulation
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1017/s1867299x00004633
  • ISSN: 1867-299X; 2190-8249
  • Schlagwörter: Safety Research ; Law
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:p>Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 5 March 2015 In Joined Cases C-503/13 and C-504/13, preliminary ruling in the proceedings Boston ScientificMedizintechnik GmbH v AOK Sachsen-Anhalt — Die Gesundheitskasse (C-503/13), Betriebskrankenkasse RWE (C-504/13)</jats:p><jats:p>On 5 March 2015, the European Court of Justice issued a preliminary ruling on two issues arising under the EU Product Liability Directive, which imposes objective, no-fault or strict liability, but not absolute liability, for defective products. Despite the wide range of issues arising under this directive, the Court has had only a few occasions to construe its ambiguous terms. This case, however, provided an opportunity to the Court to settle key issues relating to the defect test and the scope of damages compensable under the directive. As in other civil law cases, the question arises whether the Court's light treatment will provide a sound basis for the further development of product liability in Europe. The Court did not answer the questions posed by the referring court, but in some respects went beyond these questions and in other respects avoided the difficult issues raised thereby. As discussed in this note, the Court paints with a broad brush, and the test set forth in its judgment to determine whether a product is defective, may itself be defective.</jats:p>