• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Comparative evaluation of early vs. deferred vitrectomy in Eales' Disease
  • Beteiligte: Kumar, Atul; Tiwari, Hem Kumar; Singh, R. P.; Verma, Lalit; Prasad, Nagendra
  • Erschienen: Wiley, 2000
  • Erschienen in: Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica, 78 (2000) 1, Seite 77-78
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2000.078001077.x
  • ISSN: 1600-0420; 1395-3907
  • Schlagwörter: Ophthalmology
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>ABSTRACT.</jats:title><jats:p><jats:bold>Methods:</jats:bold> 40 cases of vitreous haemorrhage secondary to Eales' disease were taken up for vitrectomy. Depending upon duration of vitreous haemorrhage patients were divided into two groups: Group I (20 eyes); early vitrectomy group with duration between 3–6 months; Group II (20 eyes); deferred vitrectomy group with duration of more than 6 months. All patients were followed up for a minimum period of 3 months following vitrectomy.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Results:</jats:bold> Eyes in Group I showing a preoperative ultrasonic picture of complete posterior vitreous detachment, less mobility of organised vitreous haemorrhage and mid vitreous organisation on kinetic echography achieved a final visual acuity of 6/9 or better in 13 (65%) eyes as compared to 4 (20%) eyes in Group II (p&lt;0.01). Poor visual outcome in the deferred group was secondary to cystoid macular oedema, macular scar, macular pucker formation and macular degeneration.</jats:p><jats:p><jats:bold>Conclusion:</jats:bold> Improved visual outcome in the early vitrectomy group was probably because the haemorrhagic blood and its toxic products had less time to damage the macula, a lesser incidence of macular traction and cystoid macular oedema.</jats:p>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang