Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
Medientyp:
E-Artikel
Titel:
The unequal burden of human-wildlife conflict
Beteiligte:
Braczkowski, Alexander R.;
O’Bryan, Christopher J.;
Lessmann, Christian;
Rondinini, Carlo;
Crysell, Anna P.;
Gilbert, Sophie;
Stringer, Martin;
Gibson, Luke;
Biggs, Duan
Erschienen:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2023
Erschienen in:
Communications Biology, 6 (2023) 1
Sprache:
Englisch
DOI:
10.1038/s42003-023-04493-y
ISSN:
2399-3642
Entstehung:
Anmerkungen:
Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Human-wildlife conflict is one of the most pressing sustainable development challenges globally. This is particularly the case where ecologically and economically important wildlife impact the livelihoods of humans. Large carnivores are one such group and their co-occurrence with low-income rural communities often results in real or perceived livestock losses that place increased costs on already impoverished households. Here we show the disparities associated with the vulnerability to conflict arising from large carnivores on cattle (<jats:italic>Bos taurus</jats:italic>) globally. Across the distribution of 18 large carnivores, we find that the economic vulnerability to predation losses (as measured by impacts to annual per capita income) is between two and eight times higher for households in transitioning and developing economies when compared to developed ones. This potential burden is exacerbated further in developing economies because cattle keepers in these areas produce on average 31% less cattle meat per animal than in developed economies. In the lowest-income areas, our estimates suggest that the loss of a single cow or bull equates to nearly a year and a half of lost calories consumed by a child. Finally, our results show that 82% of carnivore range falls outside protected areas, and five threatened carnivores have over one third of their range located in the most economically sensitive conflict areas. This unequal burden of human-carnivore conflict sheds light on the importance of grappling with multiple and conflicting sustainable development goals: protecting life on land and eliminating poverty and hunger.</jats:p>