Nitschmann, Caroline C.;
Hurley, Rachel M.;
Becker, Marc A.;
Hou, Xiaonan;
Hoch, Ute;
Harding, Thomas C.;
Charych, Deborah H.;
Kaufmann, Scott H.;
Haluska, Paul;
Weroha, Saravut J.
Abstract B50: Antineoplastic activity of Top I inhibitor etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) and PARP inhibitor rucaparib (CO-388) in platinum-resistant high-grade serous BRCA WT ovarian cancer PDX models
Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
Medientyp:
E-Artikel
Titel:
Abstract B50: Antineoplastic activity of Top I inhibitor etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) and PARP inhibitor rucaparib (CO-388) in platinum-resistant high-grade serous BRCA WT ovarian cancer PDX models
Beteiligte:
Nitschmann, Caroline C.;
Hurley, Rachel M.;
Becker, Marc A.;
Hou, Xiaonan;
Hoch, Ute;
Harding, Thomas C.;
Charych, Deborah H.;
Kaufmann, Scott H.;
Haluska, Paul;
Weroha, Saravut J.
Erschienen:
American Association for Cancer Research (AACR), 2016
Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>Background: At the time of ovarian cancer platinum resistance, standard therapies have limited activity. New anti-cancer drug combinations may lead to improved clinical outcomes. Activity of topoisomerase I (Top I) inhibitors or poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors have been reported in ovarian cancer and have demonstrated potentiation in other models.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Objective: To investigate the efficacy of the Top I inhibitor etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) and the PARP inhibitor rucaparib (CO-338) as single agents and in combination in patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of ovarian cancer.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Methods: Five ovarian cancer PDX models in SCID mice were treated for 28 days with NKTR-102 (10 mg/kg/q7d IV), rucaparib (150 mg/kg/qd PO), or combination NKTR-102 plus rucaparib at the same doses and schedules. Of the five PDX models, four were platinum resistant and one was a platinum-sensitive positive control. Each treatment arm had a total of 10 mice and animals were observed daily for body weight and general condition. Tumor size was assessed weekly by ultrasound. The primary endpoint was change in tumor cross-sectional area (cm2) from pretreatment baseline to final tumor burden. Western blot was performed to investigate potential biomarkers of response.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Results: Compared to vehicle-treated controls, statistically significant improvement (p&lt;0.05) was observed in 3 of 5 models in single agent rucaparib treated tumors and in 5 of 5 models in single agent NKTR-102 treated tumors. The combination of NKTR-102 plus rucaparib also demonstrated statistically significant improvement compared to vehicle-treated controls in 5 of 5 models. The combination of NKTR-102 plus rucaparib induced maximal tumor regression in 2 of 5 tumors with a trend towards smaller tumors compared to single agent treatment arms. This was not found to be statistically significant in the 28 day study period under which the experiment was performed. Exploratory analysis to assess candidate drug response determinants (e.g.Top I, PAPR I, and PARP polymer formation levels) was investigated.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Conclusion: NKTR-102 and rucaparib are well tolerated in mice and demonstrate activity in platinum-resistant and platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer PDX models. Combination therapy demonstrated a trend towards decreased tumor size when compared to single agent activity during treatment. Current efforts are focused on extending the time on study for the PDX models evaluated to determine if statistical superiority of the NKTR-102/rucaparib combination can be established.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Citation Format: Caroline C. Nitschmann, Rachel M. Hurley, Marc A. Becker, Xiaonan Hou, Ute Hoch, Thomas C. Harding, Deborah H. Charych, Scott H. Kaufmann, Paul Haluska, Saravut J. Weroha. Antineoplastic activity of Top I inhibitor etirinotecan pegol (NKTR-102) and PARP inhibitor rucaparib (CO-388) in platinum-resistant high-grade serous BRCA WT ovarian cancer PDX models. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Ovarian Cancer Research: Exploiting Vulnerabilities; Oct 17-20, 2015; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B50.</jats:p>