• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: The concept of mutuum cum stipulatione
  • Beteiligte: Gröschler, Peter
  • Erschienen: Brill, 2006
  • Erschienen in: Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review
  • Sprache: Nicht zu entscheiden
  • DOI: 10.1163/157181906778946010
  • ISSN: 0040-7585; 1571-8190
  • Schlagwörter: Law ; History
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:sec><jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Roman documents of loan mostly follow the form of the so-called <jats:italic>mutuum cum stipulatione.</jats:italic> The informal loan contract (<jats:italic>mutuum</jats:italic>) is supplemented by a <jats:italic>stipulatio</jats:italic> in which the borrower faithfully promises the repayment of the loan. This combined contract was probably meant to include interest to the documented loan capital in a legally valid way. This was achieved by using a <jats:italic>stipulatio</jats:italic> which was structured in an abstract way. Unlike the <jats:italic>mutuum</jats:italic> abstract stipulations were valid whether the loan capital had been paid to the borrower or not. Actually, the archive of the Sulpicii suggests that in the documents <jats:italic>mutuum</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>stipulatio</jats:italic> existed independently of each other. Contrary to prevailing opinion, this combined model, probably representing the initial concept of <jats:italic>mutuum cum stipulatione,</jats:italic> was also supported by Roman jurisprudence, most likely by Ulpian. Consequently, the <jats:italic>contractus re et verbis</jats:italic>, which often led legal historians to assume interpolations, has to be regarded as a category of classical Roman law.</jats:p> </jats:sec>