• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Differences in Macrocognition Strategies With Face to Face and Distributed Teams
  • Beteiligte: Patterson, Emily S.; Bernal, Fernando; Stephens, Robert
  • Erschienen: SAGE Publications, 2012
  • Erschienen in: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1177/1071181312561066
  • ISSN: 2169-5067; 1071-1813
  • Schlagwörter: General Medicine
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:p> Deciding is an important macrocognition function for small teams performing overconstrained tasks. It is unclear how macro cognition strategies differ for small teams that work in a traditional face to face configuration as opposed to a physically distributed configuration. In this study, a process tracing analysis was conducted to identify differences in deciding strategies for face to face as compared to distributed three-person teams executing a military logistics planning task. Deciding strategies employed by emergent leaders were found to include conversation dominance, using the identification of a plan for submission as the work stopping rule, and strengthening and weakening commitment to a solution by ruling out options, adding new factors for consideration, and delaying commitment to any solution. Distributed teams used one strategy significantly more often than face to face teams: ruling out options. Implications are discussed. </jats:p>