• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Accuracy of biometric formulae in hypermetropic patients undergoing cataract surgery
  • Beteiligte: Mustafa, Mohammad Z; Khan, Ashraf A; Bennett, Harry; Tatham, Andrew J; Wright, Mark
  • Erschienen: SAGE Publications, 2019
  • Erschienen in: European Journal of Ophthalmology, 29 (2019) 5, Seite 510-515
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1177/1120672118803509
  • ISSN: 1120-6721; 1724-6016
  • Schlagwörter: Ophthalmology ; General Medicine
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: Purpose: To audit and analyse the accuracy of current biometric formulae on refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in patients with axial length less than 22 mm. Methods: A total of 84 eyes from 84 patients with axial length <22 mm were identified from consecutive patients undergoing cataract surgery retrospectively at a single university hospital. All subjects had biometry using the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc, Dublin, CA, USA) and a Sensar AR40 intraocular lens implant (Abbott Medical Optics, CA, USA). One eye from each patient was randomly selected for inclusion. Prediction errors were calculated by comparing expected refraction from optimized formulas (SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis and Holladay 1) to postoperative refraction. A national survey of ophthalmologists was conducted to ascertain biometric formula preference for small eyes. Results: The mean axial length was 21.00 ± 0.55 mm. Mean error was greatest for Hoffer Q at −0.57 dioptres. There was no significant difference in mean absolute error between formulae. SRK/T achieved the highest percentage of outcomes within 0.5 dioptres (45.2%) and 1 dioptre (76.2%) of target. Shallower anterior chamber depth was associated with higher mean absolute error for SRK/T (p = 0.028), Hoffer Q (p = 0.003) and Haigis (p = 0.016) but not Holladay (p = 0.111). Conclusion: SRK/T had the highest proportion of patients achieving refractive results close to predicted outcomes. However, there was a significant association between a shallower anterior chamber depth and higher mean absolute error for all formulae except Holladay 1. This suggests that anterior chamber depth with axial length should be considered when counselling patients about refractive outcome.