• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: A suite of evaluation resources for Dementia Friendly Communities: Development and guidance for use
  • Beteiligte: Buckner, Stefanie; Lafortune, Louise; Darlington, Nicole; Dickinson, Angela; Killett, Anne; Mathie, Elspeth; Mayrhofer, Andrea; Woodward, Michael; Goodman, Claire
  • Erschienen: SAGE Publications, 2022
  • Erschienen in: Dementia
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1177/14713012221106634
  • ISSN: 1471-3012; 1741-2684
  • Schlagwörter: General Social Sciences ; Sociology and Political Science ; General Medicine
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives</jats:title><jats:p> In the context of a growing number of dementia friendly communities (DFCs) globally, a need remains for robust evaluation, and for tools to capture relevant evidence. This paper reports the development of a suite of evaluation resources for DFCs through a national study in England. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p> Fieldwork took place in six diverse case study sites across England. A mixed methods design was adopted that entailed documentary analysis, focus groups, interviews, observations, and a survey. Participants were people affected by dementia and practice-based stakeholders. A national stakeholder workshop was held to obtain input beyond the research sites. A workshop at the end of the study served to check the resonance of the findings and emerging outputs with stakeholders from the case study DFCs. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p> The study had three key outputs for the evaluation of DFCs: First, an evaluation framework that highlights thematic areas to be considered in evaluating DFCs. Second, a Theory of Change that presents inputs into a DFC and short, medium and longer term outcomes. Third, a matrix for assessing a DFC’s degree of maturity, which enables a sense of the kinds of outcomes a DFC might realistically aspire to. These three outputs form a suite of interlinking and complementary evaluation resources for DFCs. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p> The study has contributed evidence-based resources for monitoring and evaluation that complement existing frameworks. They can be applied to arrive at a detailed assessment of how well a DFC works for people affected by dementia, and at insights into the underlying factors that can guide future policy and practice. </jats:p></jats:sec>