Beschreibung:
Background: Electronic health records (EHRs) may be controversial but they have the potential to improve patient care. We investigated whether the introduction of an electronic template-based admission form for the collection of information about the patient’s medical history and neurological and clinical state at admission in the neurosurgical unit might have an impact on the quality of documentation in a discharge record and the amount of time taken to produce this documentation. Method: A new digital template-based admission form (EHR) was developed and assessed with QNOTE, an assessment tool of medical notes with standardised criteria and the possibility to benchmark the quality of documentations. This was compared to 30 prior paper-based handwritten documentations (HWD) regarding the utilisation of these medical notes for dictation of medical discharge records. Results: Implementation of the EHR significantly improved the quality of patient admission documentation with a QNOTE mean grand score of 87 ± 22 ( p < 0.0001) compared to prior HWD with 44 ± 30. The mean documentation time for HWD was 8.1 min ± 4.1 min and the dictation time for discharge records was 10.6 min ± 3.5 min. After implementation of EHR, the documentation time increased slightly to 9.6 min ± 2.3 min (n.s.), while the time for dictation of discharge records was reduced to 5.1 min ± 1.2 min ( p < 0.0001). There was a clear correlation between a higher quality of documentation and a higher needed documentation time as well as higher quality of documentation and lower dictation times of discharge records. Conclusion: Implementation of the EHR improved the quality of patient admission documentation and reduced the dictation time of discharge records. Implications: It is crucial to involve stakeholders and users of EHRs in a timely manner during the stage of development and implementation phase to ensure optimal results and better usability.