Shrestha, Prakriti;
Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Sarah E.;
King, Elizabeth A.;
Gordon, Elisa J.;
Faden, Ruth R.;
Segev, Dorry L.;
Humbyrd, Casey Jo;
McAdams-DeMarco, Mara
Defining the ethical considerations surrounding kidney transplantation for frail and cognitively impaired patients: a Delphi study of geriatric transplant experts
Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
Medientyp:
E-Artikel
Titel:
Defining the ethical considerations surrounding kidney transplantation for frail and cognitively impaired patients: a Delphi study of geriatric transplant experts
Beteiligte:
Shrestha, Prakriti;
Van Pilsum Rasmussen, Sarah E.;
King, Elizabeth A.;
Gordon, Elisa J.;
Faden, Ruth R.;
Segev, Dorry L.;
Humbyrd, Casey Jo;
McAdams-DeMarco, Mara
Erschienen:
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022
Erschienen in:BMC Geriatrics
Sprache:
Englisch
DOI:
10.1186/s12877-022-03209-x
ISSN:
1471-2318
Entstehung:
Anmerkungen:
Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Background</jats:title>
<jats:p>Among adult kidney transplant (KT) candidates, 21% are frail and 55% have cognitive impairment, increasing the risk of pre- and post-KT mortality. Centers often assess frailty status and cognitive function during transplant evaluation to help identify appropriate candidate. Yet, there are no ethical guidelines regarding the use of frailty and cognitive function during this evaluation. We seek to develop a clinical consensus on balancing utility and justice in access to KT for frail and cognitively impaired patients.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Methods</jats:title>
<jats:p>Twenty-seven experts caring for ESRD patients completed a two-round Delphi panel designed to facilitate consensus (> 80% agreement).</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Results</jats:title>
<jats:p>Experts believed that denying patients transplantation based solely on expected patient survival was inequitable to frail or cognitively impaired candidates; 100% agreed that frailty and cognitive impairment are important factors to consider during KT evaluation. There was consensus that health related quality of life and social support are important to consider before waitlisting frail or cognitively impaired patients. Experts identified important factors to consider before waitlisting frail (likely to benefit from KT, frailty reversibility, age, and medical contraindications) and cognitively impaired (degree of impairment and medication adherence) patients.</jats:p>
</jats:sec><jats:sec>
<jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title>
<jats:p>Clinical experts believed it was ethically unacceptable to allocate organs solely based on patients’ expected survival; frailty and cognitive impairment should be measured at evaluation when weighed against other clinical factors. Ethical guidelines regarding the use of frailty and cognitive function during KT evaluation ought to be developed.</jats:p>
</jats:sec>