> Detailanzeige

Noring, Kristina; Carlsten, Mattias; Sonnevi, Kristina; Wahlin, Björn Engelbrekt

The value of complete remission according to positron emission tomography prior to autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma: a population-based study showing improved outcome

Literatur-
verwaltung

Zur
Merkliste

Lösche von
Merkliste

Per Whatsapp teilen

Schließen

Merkliste



Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
  • Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: The value of complete remission according to positron emission tomography prior to autologous stem cell transplantation in lymphoma: a population-based study showing improved outcome
  • Beteiligte: Noring, Kristina; Carlsten, Mattias; Sonnevi, Kristina; Wahlin, Björn Engelbrekt
  • Erschienen: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021
  • Erschienen in: BMC Cancer
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08225-5
  • ISSN: 1471-2407
  • Schlagwörter: Cancer Research ; Genetics ; Oncology
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>Chimeric antigen-receptor T-cell and bispecific antibody therapies will likely necessitate a reconsideration of the role of autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT) in lymphoma. Patients who are likely to profit from ASCT need to be better identified.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Here, we investigated the value of positron emission tomography/computerized tomography (PET/CT) before ASCT. All 521 patients transplanted for lymphoma 1994–2019 at Karolinska (497 conditioned with BEAM) were included.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Outcome improved over three calendar periods 1994–2004, 2005–2014, 2015–2019 (2-year overall survival [OS]: 66, 73, 83%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.018). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) at 100 days over the three periods were 9.8, 3.9, 2.9%, respectively. The OS improvement between 1994 and 2004 and 2005–2014 was due to lower NRM (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.027), but the large OS advance from 2015 was not accompanied by a significant reduction in NRM (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.6). The fraction of PET/CT as pre-ASCT assessment also increased over time: 1994–2004, 2%; 2005–2014, 24%; 2015–2019, 60% (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; 0.00005). Complete responses (PET/CT-CR) were observed in 77% and metabolically active partial responses (PET/CT-PR) in 23%. PET/CT-CR was a predictor for survival in the entire population (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.0003), also in the subpopulations of aggressive B-cell (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.004) and peripheral T-cell (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> = 0.024) lymphomas. Two-year OS and progression-free survival (OS/PFS) for patients in PET/CT-CR were in relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell lymphoma 87%/75% and peripheral T-cell lymphoma 91%/78%. The corresponding figures in PET/CT-PR were 43%/44 and 33%/33%. Patients with solitary PET/CT-positive lesions showed acceptable outcome with ASCT followed by local irradiation (2-year OS/PFS 80%/60%). CT was less discriminative: 2-year OS/PFS: CT-CR, 76%/66%; CT-PR, 62%/51%. Outcome was inferior after BEAC compared with BEAM conditioning.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>We conclude that the improved outcome reflects better, PET/CT-informed, identification of patients who should proceed to ASCT. The excellent survival of patients in PET/CT-CR indicates that ASCT should remain part of standard therapy for lymphoma.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang