• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Pilot study to evaluate a novel measure of self-perceived competencies among dental students
  • Beteiligte: Schmalz, Gerhard; Kullmann, Henrike; Sensky, Tom; Kreher, Deborah; Haak, Rainer; Büchi, Stefan; Ziebolz, Dirk
  • Erschienen: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022
  • Erschienen in: BMC Medical Education, 22 (2022) 1
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1186/s12909-022-03663-6
  • ISSN: 1472-6920
  • Schlagwörter: Education ; General Medicine
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Background</jats:title> <jats:p>PRISM is a novel approach to support self-reflection and learning appraisal in dental students, based on a visual metaphor. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether PRISM measurments would be reproducible and sensitive to detect learning progress in undergraduate dental students in their clinical years.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Voluntarily participating dental students were included. To evaluate reproducibility, a mixed cohort of 10 students each in 3<jats:sup>rd</jats:sup>, 4<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> and 5<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> year (total <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 30) was recruited and received three identically structured PRISM interviews within one week without any other teaching events. To assess perceived learning progress, 29 volunteer 3<jats:sup>rd</jats:sup> year students participated in three interviews during their clinical simulation course (beginning, middle, end). Distances between Subject and Objects was measured in millimeter; objects were classified into close or branched clusters depending on their distance from each other on the PRISM board.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>Values for perceived competencies within PRISM interviews during one week were comparable between the three time points in the mixed cohort (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 30; <jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &gt; 0.05). Comparing the three subgroups (3<jats:sup>rd</jats:sup>, 4<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> and 5<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> year, each <jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 10), PRISM indicated that 3<jats:sup>rd</jats:sup> year students perceived their competencies are significantly lower than the 4<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> and 5<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> year students (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.01). 3<jats:sup>rd</jats:sup> year students had less often a branched cluster of objects than the other two groups (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; 0.05).</jats:p> <jats:p>PRISM showed that over time, 3<jats:sup>rd</jats:sup> year students perceived a gain in their competencies in conservative dentistry and its sub-disciplines (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> ≤ 0.01). The PRISM data indicated that by the end of the simulation course, the students appeared to show higher discrimination of their self-perceptions between sub-topics in conservative dentistry than at the start of the course (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = 0.01).</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title> <jats:p>PRISM yields a reproducible measure of individual students' learning progress. It is a promising novel approach for appraisal in dental education. Further work is needed to confirm the generalisability of the findings.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang