• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Feasibility of a tailored home-based exercise intervention during neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients
  • Beteiligte: Sturgeon, Kathleen M.; Smith, Amanda M.; Federici, Elizabeth H.; Kodali, Namratha; Kessler, Renée; Wyluda, Edward; Cream, Leah V.; Ky, Bonnie; Schmitz, Kathryn H.
  • Erschienen: Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2022
  • Erschienen in: BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1186/s13102-022-00420-6
  • ISSN: 2052-1847
  • Schlagwörter: Rehabilitation ; Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation ; Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:sec> <jats:title>Purpose</jats:title> <jats:p>To evaluate the feasibility of a home-based moderate-to-vigorous intensity, phased (introduction, intermediate, maintenance), exercise prescription in breast cancer patients receiving cardiotoxic neoadjuvant chemotherapy.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Methods</jats:title> <jats:p>Nineteen breast cancer patients were randomized to intervention or control for the duration of chemotherapy (16–24 weeks). The intervention was one aerobic exercise session at 80–90% VO<jats:sub>2max</jats:sub> for 25 min/week and 65%-75% VO<jats:sub>2max</jats:sub> for ≥ 50 min/week. Adherence to the tailored home-based program was assessed by heart rate monitors. Acceptability, tolerability, feasibility, efficacy, change in VO<jats:sub>2max</jats:sub>, and patient reported outcomes, safety, and clinical events were assessed.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Results</jats:title> <jats:p>25.7% of eligible women consented (acceptability). Adherence was 87.6%. Women were not able to maintain exercise intensity as chemotherapy progressed (23.7% of exercise minutes were completed at prescribed heart rate during maintenance). Efficacy of the intervention was demonstrated by maintenance of VO<jats:sub>2max</jats:sub> (−1.0 ± 13.2%) compared to (−27.5 ± 7.4%) the control group. Further, during and after therapy, patients in the intervention arm reported less fatigue (control-baseline: 14.4 ± 15.9; midpoint: 19.0 ± 11.4; follow-up: 29.4 ± 20.0; intervention-baseline: 29.2 ± 24.6; midpoint: 24.6 ± 14.4; follow-up: 23.6 ± 11.9), impairment in activities (control-baseline: 13.7 ± 16.0; midpoint: 32.8 ± 17.0; follow-up: 58.6 ± 27.9; intervention-baseline: 38.7 ± 31.8; midpoint: 47.1 ± 27.5; follow-up: 47.5 ± 31.0), and pain (control-baseline: 80.8 ± 17.1; midpoint: 73.9 ± 20.7; follow-up: 50.7 ± 25.7; intervention-baseline: 68.7 ± 28.4; midpoint: 61.4 ± 22.5; follow-up: 65.3 ± 22.4). There were no differences in adverse events, treatment delays, or pathological complete response.</jats:p> </jats:sec><jats:sec> <jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title> <jats:p>Neoadjuvant breast cancer patients maintained approximately one hour/week of moderate-intensity exercise over the course of their treatment. Further, this volume of exercise was sufficient to maintain fitness capacity and quality of life compared to the control group.</jats:p> <jats:p><jats:italic>Trial registry</jats:italic>: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03280836, prospectively registered 9/13/2017, <jats:ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03280836">https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03280836</jats:ext-link>.</jats:p> </jats:sec>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang