• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Common garden experiments to study local adaptation need to account for population structure
  • Beteiligte: de Villemereuil, Pierre; Gaggiotti, Oscar E.; Goudet, Jérôme
  • Erschienen: Wiley, 2022
  • Erschienen in: Journal of Ecology
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.13528
  • ISSN: 1365-2745; 0022-0477
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p> <jats:list> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Common garden experiments are precious to study adaptive phenomenon and adaptive potential, in that they allow to study local adaptation without the confounding effect of phenotypic plasticity. The <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub>ST</jats:sub> − <jats:italic>F</jats:italic><jats:sub>ST</jats:sub> comparison framework, comparing genetic differentiation at the phenotypic and molecular level, is the usual way to test and measure whether local adaptation influences phenotypic divergence between populations.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Here, we highlight that the assumptions behind the expected equality <jats:italic>Q</jats:italic><jats:sub>ST</jats:sub> = <jats:italic>F</jats:italic><jats:sub>ST</jats:sub> under neutrality correspond to a very simple model of population genetics. While the equality might, on average, be robust to violation of such assumptions, more complex population structure can generate strong evolutionary noise.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p><jats:italic>Synthesis</jats:italic>. We highlight recent methodological developments aimed at overcoming this issue and at providing a more general framework to detect local adaptation, using less restrictive assumptions. We invite empiricists to look into these methods and theorists to continue developing even more general methods.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list> </jats:p>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang