Erschienen in:
BJU International, 129 (2022) 1, Seite 123-129
Sprache:
Englisch
DOI:
10.1111/bju.15395
ISSN:
1464-4096;
1464-410X
Entstehung:
Anmerkungen:
Beschreibung:
ObjectiveTo compare stent‐related symptoms (SRS) of loop‐tail (LT) and conventional double J (DJ) stents after uncomplicated flexible ureterorenoscopy (fURS), in a prospective randomised controlled single‐blind parallel‐group study.Patients and MethodsPatients undergoing fURS were randomised into two groups: the LT Group received LT stents (Polaris™ Loop) and the DJ Group received conventional DJ stents (Vortek®). The stent was removed after 4 weeks. The Ureteric Stent Symptom Questionnaire (USSQ) was administered at 2 days, 4 and 8 weeks (baseline evaluation) after stent insertion. The primary endpoint was to compare the Urinary Symptom Index Score of the LT vs DJ groups at 4 weeks after stent insertion. The secondary endpoints were to compare the USSQ domains’ subscores at 2 days and 4 weeks after stent insertion, USSQ single answers at 4 weeks, and the 4‐week USSQ domains’ subscores adjusted for baseline.ResultsA total of 68 patients were randomised (34 LT and 34 DJ). The answers given at 4 weeks were not significantly different between the two groups for the Urinary Symptom Index Score (P = 0.982), Pain Index Score (P = 0.169), visual analogue scale (P = 0.276), and all the other domains of the USSQ. At 4 weeks, the single‐answer analysis did not find any differences between the groups; the urinary symptoms were all comparable, as was the requirement for pain painkillers (P = 0.684) and pain during sex (P = 0.496). There were also no significant differences for every single domain score for the responses given at 2 days. The same applied to USSQ subscores at 4 weeks adjusted for the 8‐week baseline results, which were also comparable.ConclusionsThe study found no differences in terms of SRS between the LT and DJ groups, either at 2 days or 4 weeks after stent insertion, with or without baseline correction.