• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Comparison of Sectioning Rates Among Carbide and Diamond Burs Using Three Casting Alloys
  • Beteiligte: Siegel, Sharon Crane; von Fraunhofer, Joseph Anthony
  • Erschienen: Wiley, 1999
  • Erschienen in: Journal of Prosthodontics
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849x.1999.tb00045.x
  • ISSN: 1059-941X; 1532-849X
  • Schlagwörter: General Dentistry
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:sec><jats:title>Purpose</jats:title><jats:p>This study compared the sectioning rates of commercially available high noble, noble, and base metal casting alloys using two new cross‐cut tungsten carbides specifically manufactured for alloy sectioning and two medium grit diamond burs.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Materials and Methods</jats:title><jats:p>Rectangular bars cast from a base metal alloy (Ni‐Cr‐Mo‐Be), a noble alloy (Pd‐Cu‐Au), and a high noble alloy (Au‐Ag‐Cu‐Pd) were sectioned under controlled conditions. Two types of cross‐cut tungsten carbide and two types of medium grit diamond burs were tested using a high‐speed handpiece under a coolant flow rate of 20 mL/min and an applied load at the bur tip of 0.9 N (91.5 g). Three 4‐mm cuts were made through the alloy specimens using six burs of each type. The time required for Cuts 1, 2, and 3 was recorded, and sectioning rates in millimeters per minute were calculated as a relative measure of cutting efficiency. For each alloy, the total time required for the three cuts was analyzed using one‐way analysis of variance (one‐way ANOVA) and Scheffé tests (α= 0.05) to determine differences in sectioning rate among bur types.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>In general, mean sectioning rate for Cut 1 through Cut 3 decreased with longer use of the bur. Regarding total sectioning times, the carbide burs sectioned the base metal alloy significantly faster (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; .001) than the diamond burs. However, diamond burs sectioned the high noble alloy significantly faster (<jats:italic>P</jats:italic> &lt; .001) than the carbide burs. Diamond burs also sectioned the noble alloy more quickly than the carbide burs, but the difference was not statistically significant.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The cross‐cut tungsten carbide burs should be used to section the base metal alloy but the medium grit diamond burs should be used to section the high noble alloy.</jats:p></jats:sec>