Erschienen in:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology, 38 (2011) s11, Seite 214-222
Sprache:
Englisch
DOI:
10.1111/j.1600-051x.2010.01661.x
ISSN:
0303-6979;
1600-051X
Entstehung:
Anmerkungen:
Beschreibung:
Renvert S, Polyzois I, Claffey N. How do implant surface characteristics influence peri‐implant disease? J Clin Periodontol 2011; 38 (Suppl. 11): 214–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐051X.2010.01661.x.AbstractObjectives: To review the literature on how implant surface characteristics influence peri‐implant disease.Material and Methods: A search of PubMed and The Cochrane Library of the Cochrane Collaboration (CENTRAL) as well as a hand search of articles were conducted. Publications and articles accepted for publication up to March 2010 were included.Results: Thirteen studies were selected for the review. Human studies: To date, few studies have investigated if such differences occur. Limited data suggest that smooth surfaces may be less affected by peri‐implantitis than rough surface implants. Animal studies: In ligature‐induced peri‐implantitis studies, no difference between surfaces has been reported. In a spontaneous progression model of peri‐implantitis, there was a suggestion that the progression was more pronounced at implants with a porous anodized surface.Conclusion: The current review revealed that only a few studies provided data on how implant surfaces influence peri‐implant disease. Based on the limited data available, there is no evidence that implant surface characteristics can have a significant effect on the initiation of peri‐implantitis.