Beschreibung:
<jats:title>SUMMARY</jats:title><jats:sec><jats:title>Background</jats:title><jats:p>Many tools are used to examine the Quality of Life (QOL) of patients with kidney disease, but little is known about how culturally relevant they are and why one should utilise one tool over another. As part of a larger study on the QOL of dialysis patients in United Arab Emirates, the cultural relevance of two tools (SF‐36 and the QOL Index) was examined. This paper suggests a model to establish cultural relevance of QOL tools.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Method</jats:title><jats:p>A descriptive comparative survey design using a mixed method design was used in 2007 to study the QOL of 161 patients on dialysis and 350 people from the community. The cultural relevance of each tool was assessed by (i) examining missed questions, (ii) asking respondents about the cultural relevance of each tool, (iii) asking respondents what questions could be added or deleted to make the tools more culturally relevant and (iv) asking respondents to identify the factors that might contribute to their QOL.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Of respondents, 94.7% from the dialysis sample and 90.4% from the community sample considered both tools culturally relevant. The QOL Index tool had more missing data. Many of the themes generated from the analysis of the qualitative data were addressed by the subscales of both tools. Themes not addressed by either tool were concerned with values, safety and country.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion</jats:title><jats:p>Cultural adaptation of QOL tools needs to follow well‐established guidelines. The target population should be involved in establishing the cultural relevance of QOL tools.</jats:p></jats:sec>