• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Anticipating and experiencing post‐operative pain: the patients' perspective
  • Beteiligte: CARR, ELOISE C.J.; THOMAS, V.J.
  • Erschienen: Wiley, 1997
  • Erschienen in: Journal of Clinical Nursing
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.1997.tb00304.x
  • ISSN: 0962-1067; 1365-2702
  • Schlagwörter: General Medicine ; General Nursing
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:title>Summary</jats:title><jats:p> <jats:list list-type="explicit-label"> <jats:list-item><jats:p>This study uses a qualitative approach to explore patients' expectations and experiences of pain, factors contributing to the effective/ineffective management of their pain and strategies patients reported as helpful when experiencing pain. Ten patients on a mixed surgical ward at a District General Hospital in the south of England participated in the study.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Pain scores, using a visual analogue scale, were obtained for ‘expected’ pain pre‐operatively and ‘worst pain experienced’. A taped in‐depth interview exploring patients' experience of pain after surgery took place on the fifth post‐operative day.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Details of analgesia were also collected for the 5 days following surgery.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Patients expected pain after surgery but the intensity of the pain they experienced was often significantly greater than anticipated.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>Lack of information, inadequate pain assessment and ineffective pain control contributed to this finding.</jats:p></jats:list-item> <jats:list-item><jats:p>It is suggested that new pain technology, such as epidural and patient‐controlled analgesia, may not change the prevalence and incidence of pain unless the systems these technologies are placed within also change.</jats:p></jats:list-item> </jats:list> </jats:p>