Langner, Ingo;
Ohlmeier, Christoph;
Zeeb, Hajo;
Haug, Ulrike;
Riedel, Oliver
Individual mortality information in the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD): a validation study using a record linkage with a large cancer registry
Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
Medientyp:
E-Artikel
Titel:
Individual mortality information in the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD): a validation study using a record linkage with a large cancer registry
Beschreibung:
<jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>Claims data need to be validated to assess their use for epidemiological research. This study aimed to examine the validity of mortality information in the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Validation study, secondary data, medical claims.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>Claims data of two German nationwide acting statutory health insurance providers (SHIs) contributing data for GePaRD; record linkage with epidemiological cancer registry providing individual official mortality information.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>All women insured with the two SHIs whose insurance coverage ended in the period 2006–2013 and who were residents of North Rhine Westphalia.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Measures</jats:title><jats:p>Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the performance of the linkage procedure. Further, we calculated measures of agreement between the official and the GePaRD-based vital status and assessed differences between the official and the GePaRD-based date of death.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>Of the 256 111 women of the linkage sample, 25 528 were classified as ‘deceased’ in GePaRD and the others as ‘alive’. Compared with the official data, the GePaRD-based vital status showed a sensitivity of 95.9% and a specificity of 99.4%. The negative predictive value was 99.6% and the positive predictive value 94.3%. The date of death agreed in 96.3% between both data sources.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>The vital status recorded in GePaRD was of high accuracy and discrepancies between dates of death in GePaRD and official dates were rare. This underlines the potential of the database for conducting large cohort studies with mortality as the endpoint.</jats:p></jats:sec>