• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Webinar-based continuing medical education in otorhinolaryngology during the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany: a longitudinal study
  • Beteiligte: Walther, Leif Erik; Blödow, Alexander; Volkenstein, Stefan; Dazert, Stefan; Löhler, Jan
  • Erschienen: BMJ, 2021
  • Erschienen in: BMJ Open, 11 (2021) 12, Seite e049687
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049687
  • ISSN: 2044-6055
  • Schlagwörter: General Medicine
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>Reliance on webinars for continuing medical education (CME) has increased since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Here, we aimed to evaluate the teaching methods used in these webinars.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Design</jats:title><jats:p>Retrospective, longitudinal study.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Setting</jats:title><jats:p>20 CME-approved webinars, conducted March–December 2020 in Germany, and lasting 2.25 hours each.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Participants</jats:title><jats:p>Otorhinolaryngologists pursuing CME credits.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Interventions</jats:title><jats:p>Postwebinar participant assessments of the speaker, effects on practical work, desired scientific content, technical quality, interactions, attention and future training behaviour.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>On average, 780 participants joined each webinar. The mean survey response rate was 35% (n=282). When asked how well the speaker had mastered the content, 38% responded ‘very well’, 44% responded ‘well’, 14% indicated ‘satisfactory’ and 4% chose ‘sufficient’. The frequency of webinars was considered appropriate by 92%, too high by 4% and too low by 4% of participants. The measured attention of the participants was 90%. After the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown, 68% of participants preferred online teaching. The average costs per participant were €3.50 (about $4.25 or £3.15) per webinar.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Although the pandemic context likely influenced the results, we conclude that periodic ear, nose and throat webinar training during COVID-19 in 2020 was an effective alternative delivery method. We found high attention rates, high levels of participant satisfaction and low costs. Evaluations and re-evaluations will be necessary to adapt teaching concepts successfully and ensure high levels of teaching and learning efficiency.</jats:p></jats:sec>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang