• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Early versus late start of direct oral anticoagulants after acute ischaemic stroke linked to atrial fibrillation: an observational study and individual patient data pooled analysis
  • Beteiligte: De Marchis, Gian Marco; Seiffge, David J.; Schaedelin, Sabine; Wilson, Duncan; Caso, Valeria; Acciarresi, Monica; Tsivgoulis, Georgios; Koga, Masatoshi; Yoshimura, Sohei; Toyoda, Kazunori; Cappellari, Manuel; Bonetti, Bruno; Macha, Kosmas; Kallmünzer, Bernd; Cereda, Carlo W.; Lyrer, Philippe; Bonati, Leo H.; Paciaroni, Maurizio; Engelter, Stefan T.; Werring, David J.
  • Erschienen: BMJ, 2022
  • Erschienen in: Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2021-327236
  • ISSN: 0022-3050; 1468-330X
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:sec><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>The optimal timing to start direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) after an acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) related to atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. We aimed to compare early (≤5 days of AIS) versus late (&gt;5 days of AIS) DOAC-start.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods</jats:title><jats:p>This is an individual patient data pooled analysis of eight prospective European and Japanese cohort studies. We included patients with AIS related to non-valvular AF where a DOAC was started within 30 days. Primary endpoints were 30-day rates of recurrent AIS and ICH.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>A total of 2550 patients were included. DOACs were started early in 1362 (53%) patients, late in 1188 (47%). During 212 patient-years, 37 patients had a recurrent AIS (1.5%), 16 (43%) before a DOAC was started; 6 patients (0.2%) had an ICH, all after DOAC-start. In the early DOAC-start group, 23 patients (1.7%) suffered from a recurrent AIS, while 2 patients (0.1%) had an ICH. In the late DOAC-start group, 14 patients (1.2%) suffered from a recurrent AIS; 4 patients (0.3%) suffered from ICH. In the propensity score-adjusted comparison of late versus early DOAC-start groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the hazard of recurrent AIS (aHR=1.2, 95% CI 0.5 to 2.9, p=0.69), ICH (aHR=6.0, 95% CI 0.6 to 56.3, p=0.12) or any stroke.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusions</jats:title><jats:p>Our results do not corroborate concerns that an early DOAC-start might excessively increase the risk of ICH. The sevenfold higher risk of recurrent AIS than ICH suggests that an early DOAC-start might be reasonable, supporting enrolment into randomised trials comparing an early versus late DOAC-start.</jats:p></jats:sec>