• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Structured reporting in radiologic education – Potential of different PI-RADS versions in prostate MRI controlled by in-bore MR-guided biopsies
  • Beteiligte: Garmer, Marietta; Karpienski, Julia; Groenemeyer, Dietrich HW; Wagener, Birgit; Kamper, Lars; Haage, Patrick
  • Erschienen: Oxford University Press (OUP), 2022
  • Erschienen in: The British Journal of Radiology
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210458
  • ISSN: 0007-1285; 1748-880X
  • Schlagwörter: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ; General Medicine
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:sec><jats:title>Objectives:</jats:title><jats:p> To evaluate the efficiency of structured reporting in radiologic education – based on the example of different PI-RADS score versions for multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Methods:</jats:title><jats:p> MpMRI of 688 prostate lesions in 180 patients were retrospectively reviewed by an experienced radiologist and by a student using PI-RADS V1 and V2. Data sets were reviewed for changes according to PI-RADS V2.1. The results were correlated with results obtained by MR-guided biopsy. Diagnostic potency was evaluated by ROC analysis. Sensitivity, specificity and correct-graded samples were evaluated for different cutpoints. The agreement between radiologist and student was determined for the aggregation of the PI-RADS score in three categories. The student’s time needed for evaluation was measured. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Results:</jats:title><jats:p> The area under curve of the ROC analysis was 0.782/0.788 (V1/V2) for the student and 0.841/0.833 (V1/V2) for the radiologist. The agreement between student and radiologist showed a Cohen‘s weighted κ coefficient of 0.495 for V1 and 0.518 for V2. Median student’s time needed for score assessment was 4:34 min for PI-RADSv1 and 2:00 min for PI-RADSv2 (p &lt; 0.001). Re-evaluation for V2.1 changed the category in 1.4% of all ratings. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Conclusion:</jats:title><jats:p> The capacity of prostate cancer detection using PI-RADS V1 and V2 is dependent on the reader‘s experience. The results from the two observers indicate that structured reporting using PI-RADS and, controlled by histopathology, can be a valuable and quantifiable tool in students‘ or residents’ education. Herein, V2 was superior to V1 in terms of inter-observer agreement and time efficacy. </jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec><jats:title>Advances in knowledge:</jats:title><jats:p> Structured reporting can be a valuable and quantifiable tool in radiologic education. Structured reporting using PI-RADS can be used by a student with good performance. PI-RADS V2 is superior to V1 in terms of inter-observer agreement and time efficacy. </jats:p></jats:sec>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang