Lapatinib versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as second-line treatment in HER-2-overexpressing metastatic gastro-esophageal cancer (GC): A randomized phase II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO).

Medientyp: E-Artikel

Titel: Lapatinib versus lapatinib plus capecitabine as second-line treatment in HER-2-overexpressing metastatic gastro-esophageal cancer (GC): A randomized phase II trial of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO)

Beteiligte: Lorenzen, Sylvie; Riera-Knorrenschild, Jorge; Haag, Georg Martin; Pohl, Michael; Thuss-Patience, Peter C.; Bassermann, Florian; Helbig, Ulrike; Weissinger, Florian; Schnoy, Elisabeth; Becker, Klaus; Stocker, Gertraud; Ruschoff, Josef; Eisenmenger, Andreas; Karapanagiotou-Schenkel, Irini; Lordick, Florian

Erschienen: American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2015

Sprache: Englisch

DOI: 10.1200/jco.2015.33.3_suppl.112

ISSN: 0732-183X; 1527-7755

Schlagwörter: Cancer Research ; Oncology

Entstehung:

Anmerkungen:

Beschreibung: 112 Background: HER2 amplification is present in a subgroup of gastroesophageal cancers (GCs). HER2 inhibition with trastuzumab has shown to improve outcomes in advanced disease. Lapatinib ditosylate (LAP), a dual anti-EGFR and anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor with preclinical activity against GC, has been approved in HER2-positive breast cancer. We aimed to study the activity of LAP in HER2-amplified GC. Methods: Patients (pts) with HER2-positive (gene amplification or increased copy numbers based on predefined criteria) advanced GC were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive LAP 1250 mg per day 1-21 plus capecitabine (CAP) 2000mg/m² on days 1-14 of a 21-day cycle or LAP 1500 mg monotherapy day 1-21 after having failed on a platinum-based first-line therapy. HER2 status was assessed centrally. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) as assessed by the investigator using RECIST 1.1 criteria. We aimed to include 38 pts per arm to show a response rate of >20% in either of the two arms. Results: 37 pts were enrolled (18 to LAP+CAP, 19 to LAP). Pts had received a median of three prior treatment lines, however, the treatment was intended to be tested as a second-line treatment. 12 pts in the LAP+CAP group (67%) and 12 pts in the LAP group (63%) had received prior trastuzumab. Only two pts (11.1%; 95% CI: 1.37 – 34.7), both in the LAP+CAP arm, achieved an objective response. The study was closed prematurely for futility. Median time to progression was 42 (95% CI: 38 to 61) days in the LAP group and 83 (95% CI: 42 to 86) days in the LAP+CAP group. Other secondary efficacy endpoints (progression-free and overall survival) were comparable in the two treatment groups. Rates of diarrhea were higher with LAP+CAP (61%; 95% CI: 35 to 83) compared to 26% (95%CI 9 to 51) with LAP mono, whereas other adverse events were mostly similar between the groups (18 [100%] vs. 17 [90%]). Conclusions: Lapatinib showed insufficient activity in HER2-amplified pretreated advanced GC. The safety profile of LAP or LAP+CAP was as expected with some more toxicity in the combination arm. Clinical trial information: NCT01145404.

Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang

Nur in Feld suchen:

Zuletzt gesuchte Begriffe: