> Detailanzeige

Fink-Lamotte, Jakob; Hilbert, Kevin; Bentz, Dorothée; Blackwell, Simon; Boehnke, Jan R.; Burghardt, Juliane; Cludius, Barbara; Ehrenthal, Johannes C.; Elsaesser, Moritz; Haberkamp, Anke; Hechler, Tanja; Kräplin, Anja; Paret, Christian; Schulze, Lars; Wilker, Sarah; Niemeyer, Helen

Response to responsible research assessment I and II from the perspective of the DGPs working group on open science in clinical psychology

Literatur-
verwaltung

Zur
Merkliste

Lösche von
Merkliste

Per Whatsapp teilen

Schließen

Merkliste



Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
  • Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Response to responsible research assessment I and II from the perspective of the DGPs working group on open science in clinical psychology
  • Beteiligte: Fink-Lamotte, Jakob; Hilbert, Kevin; Bentz, Dorothée; Blackwell, Simon; Boehnke, Jan R.; Burghardt, Juliane; Cludius, Barbara; Ehrenthal, Johannes C.; Elsaesser, Moritz; Haberkamp, Anke; Hechler, Tanja; Kräplin, Anja; Paret, Christian; Schulze, Lars; Wilker, Sarah; Niemeyer, Helen
  • Erschienen: Linnaeus University, 2024
  • Erschienen in: Meta-Psychology, 8 (2024)
  • Sprache: Nicht zu entscheiden
  • DOI: 10.15626/mp.2023.3794
  • ISSN: 2003-2714
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: We comment on the papers by Schönbrodt et al. (2022) and Gärtner et al. (2022) on responsible research assessment from the perspective of clinical psychology and psychotherapy research. Schönbrodt et al. (2022) propose four principles to guide hiring and promotion in psychology: (1) In addition to publications in scientific journals, data sets and the development of research software should be considered. (2) Quantitative metrics can be useful, but they should be valid and applied responsibly. (3) Methodological rigor, research impact, and work quantity should be considered as three separate dimensions for evaluating research contributions. (4) The quality of work should be prioritized over the number of citations or the quantity of research output. From the perspective of clinical psychology, we endorse the initiative to update current practice by establishing a matrix for comprehensive, transparent and fair evaluation criteria. In the following, we will both comment on and complement these criteria from a clinical-psychological perspective.
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang