• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: The Critical Reception of Tennyson's “Maud”
  • Beteiligte: Shannon, Edgar F.
  • Erschienen: Modern Language Association (MLA), 1953
  • Erschienen in: PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, 68 (1953) 3, Seite 397-417
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • DOI: 10.2307/459861
  • ISSN: 0030-8129; 1938-1530
  • Schlagwörter: Literature and Literary Theory ; Linguistics and Language ; Language and Linguistics
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:p>In midsummer 1855 the announcement that Alfred Tennyson would soon publish a new work stirred the reading public with eager expectancy. He was acknowledged to be the foremost living English poet and had worn the bays as Victoria's laureate for almost five years. His new volume was awaited, wrote one reviewer, with much of the avid anticipation that had attended the productions of Scott and Byron. Yet it is generally said that when <jats:italic>Maud, and Other Poems</jats:italic> appeared on 28 July 1855, there was serious dissatisfaction with the title poem. Indeed, it has become a commonplace of literary history that “Maud” was vociferously condemned by the British periodical press, and Sir Charles Tennyson, the poet's latest biographer, writes, “Poor <jats:italic>Maud</jats:italic> was received with almost universal reprobation.” But John O. Eidson main-tains, with some evidence to support his claim, that “the British criticism of ‘Maud’ was rather sharply divided,” and Amy Cruse unqualifiedly asserts that the poem “was received with tremendous enthusiasm.” In view of the conflicting testimony it seems valuable to determine as accurately as possible the critical reaction to “Maud” and also to examine its effect upon Tennyson's revision of the poem and upon his decision to proceed with the <jats:italic>Idylls of the King</jats:italic>.</jats:p>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang