• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Booster Vaccination Strategies for “Living With COVID-19”
  • Beteiligte: Kim, Jung Eun; Lee, Sunmi; Kim, Hee-Sung
  • Erschienen: Frontiers Media SA, 2022
  • Erschienen in: Frontiers in Public Health
  • Sprache: Nicht zu entscheiden
  • DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.896713
  • ISSN: 2296-2565
  • Schlagwörter: Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <jats:p>Although the primary and secondary vaccination rates in Korea account for over 75% of the total population, confirmed cases of COVID-19 are dramatically increasing due to immune waning and the Omicron variant. Therefore, it is urgent to evaluate the effectiveness of booster vaccination strategies for living with COVID-19. In this work, we have developed an age-specific mathematical model with eight age groups and included age-specific comorbidities to evaluate the effectiveness of age-specific vaccination prioritization strategies to minimize morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, we have investigated the impacts of age-specific vaccination strategies for different vaccine supplies and non-pharmaceutical intervention levels during two periods: (1) when vaccine supply was insufficient and (2) after the emergence of the omicron variant. During the first period, the best option was to vaccinate the 30–49 year age group and the group with comorbidities to minimize morbidity and mortality, respectively. However, a booster vaccination should prioritize the 30–49 year age group to promote both minimal morbidity and mortality. Critical factors, such as vaccination speed, vaccine efficacy, and non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs), should be considered for effective vaccination prioritization as well. Primary, secondary vaccinations, and a booster shot vaccinations require different age prioritization strategies under different vaccination rates, vaccine efficacies, and NPI levels.</jats:p>
  • Zugangsstatus: Freier Zugang