Chan, Edward L.;
Brandt, Ken;
Stoneham, Heather;
Antonishyn, Nick;
Horsman, Greg B.
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Enzyme Immunoassay in Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in Different Female Genitourinary Specimens
Sie können Bookmarks mittels Listen verwalten, loggen Sie sich dafür bitte in Ihr SLUB Benutzerkonto ein.
Medientyp:
E-Artikel
Titel:
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Polymerase Chain Reaction and Enzyme Immunoassay in Detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in Different Female Genitourinary Specimens
Beteiligte:
Chan, Edward L.;
Brandt, Ken;
Stoneham, Heather;
Antonishyn, Nick;
Horsman, Greg B.
Erschienen:
Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, 2000
Erschienen in:Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine
Beschreibung:
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title>
<jats:p>Background.—In high-volume laboratories, enzyme immunoassay (EIA) is the most commonly used method of detecting Chlamydia trachomatis. The optimal specimen for detecting C trachomatis is a combined urethral and cervical swab.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Objective.—To compare EIA with the combined urethral and cervical swab with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on urine alone and urine mixed with cervical cells.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Patients and Methods.—Phase 1 of the study included 752 sets of specimens used for comparison. In phase 2, another 212 samples of urine and urine plus cervical cells were added to the study for comparison of the 2 specimen types using PCR.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Results.—In phase 1, 648 samples were negative and 76 were positive by all 3 methods and specimen combinations. Enzyme immunoassay was able to detect 81 positive samples (10.8%), whereas PCR on urine alone detected 97 positive samples (12.9%) and PCR on urine plus cervical cells detected 102 positive samples (13.6%), giving a sensitivity of 75%, 93.3%, and 98.1% respectively. In phase 2, PCR on urine alone detected 119 positive samples (12.3%) and PCR on urine plus cervical cells detected 127 positive samples (13.1%), with a sensitivity of 92.2% and 98.5%, respectively.</jats:p>
<jats:p>Conclusion.—Polymerase chain reaction on urine alone or urine plus cervical cells is superior to EIA on combined cervical and urethral swabs. There is a slight advantage of adding cervical cells to the urine compared with the urine specimen alone when PCR is used as the assay for detection. The total inhibition rate in our female population is only 3.1% when PCR is used.</jats:p>