• Medientyp: E-Artikel
  • Titel: Direct healthcare costs of sedentary behaviour in the UK
  • Beteiligte: Heron, Leonie; O’Neill, Ciaran; McAneney, Helen; Kee, Frank; Tully, Mark A
  • Erschienen: BMJ, 2019
  • Erschienen in: Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health (1979-)
  • Sprache: Englisch
  • ISSN: 0143-005X; 1470-2738
  • Schlagwörter: Obesity and physical inactivity
  • Entstehung:
  • Anmerkungen:
  • Beschreibung: <sec> <label>Background</label> <p>Growing evidence indicates that prolonged sedentary behaviour increases the risk of several chronic health conditions and all-cause mortality. Sedentary behaviour is prevalent among adults in the UK. Quantifying the costs associated with sedentary behaviour is an important step in the development of public health policy.</p> </sec> <sec> <label>Methods</label> <p>National Health Service (NHS) costs associated with prolonged sedentary behaviour (≥6 hours/day) were estimated over a 1-year period in 2016–2017 costs. We calculated a population attributable fraction (PAF) for five health outcomes (type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease [CVD], colon cancer, endometrial cancer and lung cancer). Adjustments were made for potential double-counting due to comorbidities. We also calculated the avoidable deaths due to prolonged sedentary behaviour using the PAF for all-cause mortality.</p> </sec> <sec> <label>Results</label> <p>The total NHS costs attributable to prolonged sedentary behaviour in the UK in 2016–2017 were £0.8 billion, which included expenditure on CVD (£424 million), type 2 diabetes (£281 million), colon cancer (£30 million), lung cancer (£19 million) and endometrial cancer (£7 million). After adjustment for potential double-counting, the estimated total was £0.7 billion. If prolonged sedentary behaviour was eliminated, 69 276 UK deaths might have been avoided in 2016.</p> </sec> <sec> <label>Conclusions</label> <p>In this conservative estimate of direct healthcare costs, prolonged sedentary behaviour causes a considerable burden to the NHS in the UK. This estimate may be used by decision makers when prioritising healthcare resources and investing in preventative public health programmes.</p> </sec>