Anmerkungen:
Veröffentlichungsversion
begutachtet (peer reviewed)
In: TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis / Journal for Technology Assessment in Theory and Practice ; 32 (2023) 3 ; 22-27
Beschreibung:
Social experiments, also known as randomized controlled trials, are the subject of contentious discussions, giving rise to buzzwords such as 'credibility revolution,' 'experimenting society,' 'global lab,' or 'empire of truth.' While using exaggeration to illustrate opportunities and risks may well be justified, this research article analyzes to what extent the present debate is characterized by excessive hype. It finds that the transformative potential of social experiments is greatly overestimated, a judgment that applies to the reasoning of both proponents and critics.