Description:
Introduction: Catheter placement and stability are well-known challenges in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. As a result, steerable sheaths were developed to improve catheter stabilization and maintain proper catheter-tissue contact. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to see if employing a steerable sheath influences procedure outcome. Method: We performed a comprehensive literature search for studies that evaluated the efficacy and safety of Steerable Sheaths (SS) compared to Non-Steerable Sheaths (NSS) in AF ablation. The primary outcome was the rate of atrial arrhythmia (AA) freedom by the time of the last follow-up. The secondary outcomes were the procedure-related complications and procedural characteristics. Risk ratio (RR) or the mean difference (MD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Results: A total of 10 studies, including 967 AF patients (mean age: 59.2±11.1 years, 516 patients managed with SS vs. 454 with NSS), were included. SS group showed a higher rate of freedom of AA compared to NSS (RR: 1.19; 95% CI 1.09, 1.29; P < 0.001). Both techniques had similar rate for procedural-related complication (RR: 1.09, 95% CI 0.50, 2.39; P = 0.83). The SS strategy had a shorter procedure time (MD -10.6 (min.), 95% CI -20.97, -0.20; P = 0.05) but comparable fluoroscopic and radiofrequency application times to the NSS group. Conclusions: The steerable sheaths for AF catheter ablation not only reduced the total procedure time but also significantly increased the rate of successful ablation while maintaining a similar safety profile when compared to the traditional non-steerable sheaths.